Question Time AU

Take Note Debate

Energy

Senate · Monday 3 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senators debated the government's energy strategy following Question Time answers. Opposition senators argued that rising electricity costs, flatlining emissions, and high subsidies indicated policy failure, citing specific industrial risks and environmental concerns. Government senators defended their record, attributing price pressures to inherited market conditions and global shocks, while highlighting bill relief measures and the long-term cost benefits of renewable energy. The debate concluded with the motion agreed to.

Outcome

Question agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Cadell argued that the government's energy policy was failing on both economic and environmental fronts. Cadell cited a 23.6 per cent annual rise in electricity costs and warned that the Tomago aluminium smelter faced viability issues beyond 2028, threatening thousands of jobs. Cadell claimed that $9 billion in subsidies had resulted in no significant emissions reduction since 2022. Cadell suggested that a targeted emissions reduction fund would achieve abatement goals for a fraction of the current cost, contrasting this with estimates that the broader energy transition could cost the economy up to $9 trillion.