Opened the debate
Chisholm moved that the bill be read a second time, arguing it would ensure a robust migration system by facilitating the timely removal of non-citizens with no lawful basis to remain. Chisholm stated that procedural fairness provisions were being exploited to frustrate removals and proposed amendments to exclude these obligations from third country reception arrangements and removal pathway directions. Chisholm clarified that the changes did not affect visa cancellation or refusal processes, nor merits review, but targeted final removal steps. Chisholm noted the amendments reflected the Federal Court's ruling in TCXM v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, putting the legal position beyond doubt. Additionally, the bill validated past visa decisions made before the NZYQ decision to resolve uncertainty arising from the AJN23 case.