Question Time AU

General Debate

Parliamentary Committee on Human Rights

Senate · Thursday 13 February 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Independent senator Lidia Thorpe moved a motion to strengthen the role of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights. The proposal sought to mandate that ministers provide explanations before considering bills if they had failed to respond to the committee, if the committee found incompatibility with international obligations, or if recommendations were ignored. The motion also allowed senators to move further motions regarding the bill or to take note of the explanation. The motion was put to a vote and was not passed.

Outcome

The motion was not passed following a division.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Thorpe moved a motion requiring ministers to provide explanations immediately prior to the consideration of any bill under specific conditions. These conditions included instances where the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights had sought a response without receiving one, or had concluded a bill was incompatible with Australia's international human rights obligations. The motion also applied where the committee had made recommendations to amend a bill that were not implemented. Thorpe proposed that following such an explanation, any senator could move a motion relating to the bill or to take note of the explanation. The procedures were intended to be usable only once per sitting day for any given bill and were to be of continuing effect.

Votes during this debate

Division 14: Parliamentary Committee on Human Rights Not passed 15–37