Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Great Australian Bight (World Heritage Protection) Bill 2025; Second Reading

Senate · Tuesday 11 February 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated the Great Australian Bight (World Heritage Protection) Bill 2025, which sought to secure World Heritage listing for the region to permanently prohibit offshore oil and gas drilling. Senator Sarah Hanson-Young moved the second reading, arguing that the Bight is a critical biodiversity hotspot and economic asset requiring immediate protection from fossil fuel exploration. She highlighted the severe environmental risks of potential oil spills and noted strong community and Traditional Owner opposition to drilling. The debate was adjourned with leave granted for the senator to continue remarks later.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned with leave granted for the senator to continue remarks later.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Hanson-Young argued that the bill was necessary to provide permanent protection for the Great Australian Bight against offshore oil and gas exploration. Hanson-Young stated that the region supports unique marine life, including southern right whales and sea lions, with eighty-five percent of species found nowhere else on Earth. The senator cited modelling indicating that an oil spill would devastate marine reserves, kill hundreds of thousands of seabirds, and harm coastal wetlands. Hanson-Young emphasized that the Bight supports over ten thousand jobs in fishing and tourism, industries that would suffer irreversible damage from drilling. Hanson-Young noted that Traditional Owners and more than two-thirds of South Australians oppose such developments. Hanson-Young urged other parties to support the bill to prevent climate change impacts and protect the coastline from future risks.