Question Time AU

Take Note Debate

Antisemitism

Senate · Tuesday 4 February 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senators debated the government's handling of antisemitism following Question Time answers regarding the Dural incident and recent attacks on Jewish sites. Liberal senators argued the government was weak, slow to act, and failed to adequately address the security threat or support legislative inquiries. Labor senators defended their record, citing new legislation, funding for security, and special police operations, while accusing the opposition of politicising the issue. The debate concluded with the motion being agreed to.

Outcome

The motion was agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Henderson argued that the government's anti-Israel stance had fuelled antisemitic hate and division in Australia. Henderson cited condemnation from Israeli leaders regarding the government's weakness and highlighted recent attacks on synagogues and Jewish institutions. Henderson criticised the government for failing to support a judicial inquiry into campus antisemitism and for not adequately addressing the Dural terror plot. Henderson asserted that Jewish Australians were living in fear due to the government's ineffective response.

Opposition response

Scarr argued that the government was too slow to act on hate crimes legislation, comparing the timeline of the hate crimes bill to other less urgent bills. Scarr stated that the opposition was holding the government to account for the suffering of the Jewish community. Scarr shared the story of Dr Max Joseph, a Holocaust survivor, to illustrate the gravity of the current attacks on Jewish sites. Scarr concluded that the government's priorities were misplaced, favouring other legislative matters over community safety.