Without Notice

General Debate

Veterans: Health Care, Disability Services, Ryan Electorate: Community Organisations, Migration

House of Representatives · Tuesday 13 October 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Elizabeth Watson-Brown raised four distinct issues in a grievance debate. She criticised the government for initially proposing a cap on allied health services for veterans before retracting it, and opposed changes to the National Disability Insurance Scheme that replaced it with the Thriving Kids program. She highlighted concerns regarding the Queensland government's refusal to participate in the new disability support scheme. Additionally, she described local community assistance programs and criticised federal migration policies for their impact on families.

Outcome

The debate concluded with no further speakers or formal vote recorded in the transcript.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Watson-Brown argued that the proposed limit of $5,000 on allied health services for veterans ignored Royal Commission recommendations and would have delayed essential care. Watson-Brown stated that community pressure forced the government to abandon the cap, which she characterised as a betrayal of veterans. Regarding disability services, she opposed the replacement of the National Disability Insurance Scheme with the Thriving Kids program for children under eight, citing a lack of co-design and protection for people with disability. Watson-Brown expressed concern that the Queensland government's refusal to join the new program would leave families without support. Watson-Brown also criticised migration policies for causing family separation and argued that economic difficulties were caused by corporate interests rather than migrants.

Get updates like this by email