Question Time AU

General Debate

Superannuation, Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence

House of Representatives · Tuesday 15 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Jodie Belyea opposed the One Nation proposal to allow workers to divert compulsory superannuation contributions into their weekly pay. She argued that this policy would undermine long-term financial security and disproportionately harm low-income workers and women who have survived domestic violence. Belyea highlighted that easier access to superannuation could increase vulnerability to financial abuse, citing evidence from the COVID-era early release scheme. She contrasted this with the government's approach of addressing cost-of-living pressures through wage increases and superannuation on paid parental leave.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Jodie Belyea (Dunkley) (Australian Labor Party) ALP

Belyea argued that the proposal would force working Australians to sacrifice their future security for short-term relief. Belyea stated that superannuation represents hard-earned savings essential for dignified retirement, particularly for renters who may lack other assets. Belyea warned that diverting contributions could leave workers significantly worse off due to lost compound returns. Belyea emphasised that financial insecurity is a critical issue for women who have experienced domestic and family violence.