Question Time AU

General Debate

Sovereign Capability

House of Representatives · Monday 14 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by the Australian Labor Party to commend the government's Future Made in Australia agenda and the National Reconstruction Fund. Labor members argued that targeted government investment was essential to secure supply chains, protect jobs in heavy industry, and build sovereign capability in sectors such as digital infrastructure, green metals, and renewable energy. Liberal and National Party members opposed the motion, citing high energy costs, regulatory burdens, and what they described as unsustainable bailouts of failing industries as evidence of policy failure. An independent member highlighted the need for faster de-risking of clean energy investments in Western Australia. The motion was ultimately passed.

Outcome

The motion was agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Holzberger moved the motion, arguing that global supply chain vulnerabilities exposed by recent conflicts and disruptions necessitated a stronger sovereign industrial base. Holzberger credited the government with reversing decades of privatisation and economic rationalism that had eroded manufacturing capacity, particularly in the automotive sector. Holzberger highlighted the $15 billion National Reconstruction Fund as a key mechanism for crowding in private investment, citing a $75 million investment in Gilmour Space as an example of successful intervention. Holzberger asserted that the government was rebuilding industrial strength through support for metal processing facilities and renewable energy infrastructure.

Opposition response

Willcox argued that manufacturing and heavy industry were declining due to the government's high taxes, industrial relations policies, and red tape. Willcox claimed the government had spent approximately $3.7 billion bailing out struggling facilities in the Hunter, Mount Isa, Port Pirie, Hobart, Whyalla, and Gladstone. Willcox criticised the safeguard mechanism as a carbon tax that would drive industry offshore and argued that high energy costs and unreliable renewable energy targets were undermining competitiveness. Willcox asserted that political instability and broken promises regarding energy prices were deterring investment.