Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Red Lines Package Omnibus Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 14 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the introduction of the Red Lines Package Omnibus Bill 2026, aimed at preventing Australia from funding, arming, or investing in serious violations of international law. Independent members Sophie Scamps and Andrew Wilkie supported the legislation, arguing it closed gaps in domestic law regarding defence exports and investments. They highlighted the need for transparency, due diligence, and specific prohibitions on trade with entities linked to illegal settlements or genocide. The bill proposed new reporting requirements, an Anti-Genocide Commissioner, and offences related to settlement goods. Both speakers emphasised Australia's historical role in upholding international law and the moral imperative to act consistently.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Scamps contended that the nation bears obligations under global rules to stop mass killings and unlawful control of territory, yet local statutes have major loopholes. He pointed out that more than 350 authorisations for arms sales to Israel were granted from 2017 to 2023, and major commerce with the United Arab Emirates persists, lacking checks on aiding war crimes. Scamps explained the legislation fills these voids by mandating oversight of military goods, halting funding for firms tied to unlawful settlements, and creating an Anti-Genocide Commissioner. He noted the Future Fund’s multi-million dollar stakes in entities connected to the Myanmar armed forces, showing the need for stricter bans beyond ministerial choice. Scamps finished by saying the measure stops Australia from gaining from human misery and matches local rules with global duties.