Question Time AU

General Debate

Murray-Darling Basin

House of Representatives · Monday 14 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion to pause water entitlement purchases and reallocate environmental water for agriculture during the 2026-27 season. Proponents argued that exceptional inflows allowed for a temporary, risk-free boost to food security and regional economies without harming the environment. Opponents maintained that long-term sustainability required adhering to the Basin Plan and investing in efficiency and infrastructure rather than diverting environmental water. The discussion highlighted tensions between immediate agricultural needs and long-term ecological resilience under climate change.

Outcome

The motion was debated but no final result was stated in the provided transcript.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Farley moved a motion calling for an immediate pause on government water purchases until 2026 reviews were completed. Farley proposed establishing a temporary initiative to make 75 per cent of available Commonwealth environmental water accessible for agricultural production in the 2026-27 season. Farley argued that exceptional winter and spring inflows meant environmental watering obligations could be met, allowing surplus water to support the planting window. Farley emphasised that this was a one-off reallocation tied to specific conditions, not a permanent change to entitlements, and would benefit regional jobs and food security at zero cost to the government.

Opposition response

Chaffey argued that water buybacks were causing regional communities to decline, citing population drops in places like Warren. Chaffey claimed the government was neglecting regional infrastructure, pointing to the delayed Wilcannia Weir project and increased costs compared to previous estimates. Chaffey asserted that reducing water availability for agriculture threatened national food security and sovereignty. Chaffey called for an end to further water buybacks to support primary producers and regional employment.