Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Customs and Other Legislation Amendment (Illicit Tobacco Enforcement Modernisation and Other Measures) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Thursday 10 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on the government's proposal to modernise customs enforcement against illicit tobacco and strengthen proceeds-of-crime laws. Assistant Minister Julian Hill argued that the bill addresses sophisticated criminal networks by creating new offences based on observable indicators rather than intent to defraud revenue. He highlighted reforms to duty-refundable tobacco controls, streamlined seizure processes, and enhanced powers to confiscate criminal assets. The minister urged support for the legislation to protect public health and legitimate businesses, while criticising opposition policies on vaping. The debate concluded with the motion being adjourned.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Julian Hill (Bruce) (Australian Labor Party) ALP

Hill supported the bill as a necessary update to combat organised crime involved in the illicit tobacco and vape trade. Hill argued that current laws were outdated and difficult to enforce because they required proof of intent to defraud revenue, which criminals avoided by distancing themselves from importation. The proposed reforms introduce new offences based on objective observable indicators, making it easier to prosecute those involved in the supply chain. Hill also emphasised the need to close loopholes regarding duty-refundable tobacco and to streamline seizure and disposal procedures for law enforcement agencies.