Question Time AU

General Debate

Gun Control

House of Representatives · Wednesday 9 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by Andrew Gee calling for the repeal of state and federal firearm buyback schemes, which Gee characterised as unfair to law-abiding owners and ineffective against criminals. Gee argued that the schemes caused severe financial harm to regional businesses and failed to address intelligence failures regarding the Bondi attack. Bob Katter seconded the motion, citing international and historical examples to argue that strict gun laws do not reduce crime and that disarming citizens is ineffective. The debate concluded with Minister Amanda Rishworth moving to adjourn the debate, resulting in the motion passing by a vote of 88 to 47.

Outcome

The motion was passed by a division of 88 votes to 47.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Gee moved a motion arguing that the firearm buyback scheme constituted legalised theft and caused significant financial distress to legitimate firearm businesses in regional New South Wales. Gee cited specific examples of business owners facing drastic reductions in sales and staff, with some reporting turnover drops of up to 85 per cent. Gee contended that the scheme failed to target criminals or terrorists, who operate outside legal channels, and instead penalised law-abiding citizens. Gee called for a comprehensive investigation into intelligence and security failures related to the Bondi terrorist attack, rather than implementing rushed legislative changes. Gee urged the House to repeal the buyback scheme and focus on prosecuting illegal firearms trafficking.

Votes during this debate

Division 1: Gun Control Passed 88–47