Veterans

Opened the debate

McCormack argued that the government had failed to consult veterans or stakeholder organisations before introducing the cap in the budget. McCormack stated that the policy contradicted the government's commitment to not leaving anyone behind and violated the spirit of the Australian Defence Veterans' Covenant. McCormack highlighted that hundreds of veterans expressed anger and disappointment during forums held across the country. McCormack contended that the proposed savings of $748 million over three years represented a cut to essential services rather than genuine support. McCormack called for the cap to be scrapped and for the minister to be replaced by someone with greater empathy for veterans.

Opposition response

Thompson argued that the minister had ignored advice from seven advisory groups composed of veterans and ex-service organisations. Thompson stated that the carve-outs for totally and permanently impaired veterans were insufficient, citing a veteran with a leg injury who would still be affected. Thompson claimed that the lack of consultation and the sudden introduction of the cap had eroded trust in the minister and the government. Thompson warned that the financial pressure from the cap could lead to increased substance abuse and suicide among veterans. Thompson called for the immediate removal of the cap and the dismissal of the minister.