Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Thursday 20 August 2026

Continued from Monday 17 August 2026.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The House of Representatives debated the Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2026, which addresses legacy legal and compliance issues in social security, family assistance, and child support systems. Speakers from the Labor Party, National Party, and an Independent supported the bill, citing improvements to advance payments, debt recovery fairness, and the use of pre-issue income data. While the technical amendments were welcomed, concerns were raised regarding the broader systemic failures in child support enforcement and the potential for provisional income data to create unfair debts for single parents. The debate concluded with the adjournment of proceedings before a final vote was recorded.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned before the bill was passed.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Belyea supported the bill, arguing that it addressed legacy legal issues to ensure social security systems were lawful and fair. Belyea highlighted that advance payments would allow recipients to access lump sums for urgent expenses like car registration or school costs, with around 2.7 million such payments granted in 2024-25. Belyea noted that the bill allows decisions under review to be updated with new information and permits the use of pre-issue income data from the Australian Taxation Office to speed up reconciliations. Belyea emphasised that Schedule 6 introduced merits review for debt offset decisions, protecting those experiencing hardship from irreversible automated actions. Belyea also welcomed amendments ensuring correct superannuation calculations for paid parental leave and improved access to urgent payments.

Opposition response

McCormack supported the bill, noting that technical improvements to online applications and repayment flexibility would assist households, particularly women managing family budgets. McCormack argued that allowing advance payments to be requested online and adjusting repayment terms would help families facing unexpected costs during a cost-of-living crisis. McCormack stated that Schedule 2 would expedite Administrative Review Tribunal decisions by ensuring up-to-date information was available. McCormack endorsed using pre-issue income data for reconciling family tax benefit and child care subsidy but urged the government to monitor long-term impacts on assessment accuracy. McCormack commended the bill for addressing compliance issues and improving service delivery.