Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading

Moncrieff argued that extending the powers was vital to prevent a dangerous void in national security architecture. Moncrieff highlighted the bill's provisions for managing youth radicalisation, noting that extending control order durations for young people allows for more effective rehabilitation. Moncrieff emphasised that the amendments improve information sharing between agencies and maintain rigorous legal safeguards, ensuring judges have access to relevant data for risk assessment.

Wallace stated the Coalition would not oppose the bill but demanded proof that the new post-sentence order framework would not diminish operational capability. Wallace criticised the government's delay in introducing the legislation and its handling of terrorism-linked returns from Syria. Wallace expressed concern about the radicalisation of children and called for effective prevention and deradicalisation programs. Wallace supported the extension of powers but insisted on thorough scrutiny by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security.

Sharkie supported the bill and moved an amendment to disapply section 19B of the Crimes Act for terrorist acts, ensuring convictions are recorded even if charges are dismissed. Sharkie argued that individuals found guilty of terrorism should not have blank criminal records, which could allow them to work with vulnerable populations. Sharkie highlighted the rising number of people in deradicalisation programs and the need for strong protections against terrorism. Sharkie reserved the right to introduce further legislation to broaden the amendment to all terrorism offences.