Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Privatisation

House of Representatives · Tuesday 18 August 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on the impact of privatising essential services such as energy, telecommunications, and banking on Australian consumers, particularly in regional areas. The Australian Greens argued for returning these services to public ownership, citing high costs and poor service quality. Government members defended a mixed economy approach, highlighting efforts to bring outsourced public service work back in-house and partnering with the private sector for infrastructure and innovation. Independent members raised concerns about specific local issues, including regional banking closures, hospital management, and transport reliability, while calling for stronger public interest tests for any remaining public assets.

Outcome

No vote was taken as this was a Matter of Public Importance.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Watson-Brown argued that decades of bipartisan privatisation have harmed consumers by creating for-profit middlemen in energy and telecommunications sectors. Watson-Brown cited rising electricity bills and poor service from retailers like Origin and AGL, contrasting them with government-owned Ergon Energy in regional Queensland. Watson-Brown also criticised the telecommunications sector, noting high executive pay and poor coverage despite public ownership of the NBN. Watson-Brown called for ending privatisation and returning essential services to public hands to protect everyday Australians from corporate profiteering.

Government response

Gorman defended the Labor government's commitment to public services, citing the creation of Medicare and the legislation keeping the NBN in public hands. Gorman highlighted the Australian Public Service Strategic Commissioning Framework, which had brought over $542 million of core work back in-house, saving taxpayer money. Gorman also pointed to improvements in service delivery times for aged care and parental leave claims due to increased public service staffing. Gorman rejected the Greens' call for full nationalisation, arguing for a balanced approach that includes private sector choice and partnership where appropriate.