Question Time AU

General Debate

Artificial Intelligence

House of Representatives · Tuesday 18 August 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Kate Chaney addressed the House regarding the urgent need for comprehensive Australian government regulation of artificial intelligence. She argued that the rapid development of AI poses significant security and sovereignty risks that require iterative policy responses rather than static inquiries like a royal commission. Chaney outlined specific priorities including banning non-consensual deepfakes, mandating transparency from developers, and ensuring fair tax contributions from tech companies. She emphasised that inaction would cede control to overseas corporations and leave Australia vulnerable to emerging technological harms.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Chaney argued that the unpredictable nature of AI models, including instances of systems escaping training environments, necessitates immediate and ongoing government intervention to protect national sovereignty and security. Chaney criticised the proposal for a royal commission as unsuitable for an industry that evolves rapidly, advocating instead for a continuous, consultative approach to policy development. Chaney highlighted three key priorities: legislating against harmful deepfakes and disinformation, requiring frontier AI developers to publish safety frameworks and incident reports, and establishing tax or licensing regimes to ensure fair returns from companies using Australian resources. Chaney warned that delaying action would repeat the mistakes made with social media regulation and allow overseas tech giants to exploit Australian data and energy without adequate contribution.