Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Administrative and Judicial Review Legislation Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 17 August 2026

Continued from Wednesday 1 July 2026.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on the need to amend legislation governing the Administrative Review Tribunal, which replaced the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The speaker argued that the new tribunal had failed to meet efficiency targets, citing a doubled caseload and increased processing times despite significant government investment. While the speaker supported the bill's practical reforms to improve tribunal efficiency and finality, they contended that the legislation was primarily a corrective measure for previous design flaws. The coalition indicated it would support the bill but emphasized the need for greater transparency regarding the tribunal's performance.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Leeser argued that the bill addressed operational failures in the Administrative Review Tribunal, which he attributed to the initial abolition of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Leeser noted that the tribunal's caseload had doubled to over 131,000 cases and median processing times had increased by 22 weeks since its commencement in October 2024. Leeser supported specific amendments that expanded registrar powers to dismiss applications with no reasonable prospect of success and allowed for oral decisions in migration matters to improve efficiency. Leeser also endorsed identity verification requirements for migration applicants and the restoration of the 28-day review period for taxation decisions. However, he called for stronger annual reporting to ensure accountability and suggested further reforms to allow quick correction of obvious administrative errors in migration cases.