Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Medicines Shortages and Other Measures) Bill 2026, Therapeutic Goods (Charges) Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Tuesday 11 August 2026

Continued from Thursday 2 July 2026.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on legislation aimed at improving early warning systems for medicine shortages and streamlining the registration of biologic medicines. The Shadow Minister for Women supported the bill's technical improvements but argued it failed to address the root causes of supply chain vulnerabilities. An amendment was moved to call for a comprehensive national strategy to boost local manufacturing and reduce shortages. The Coalition indicated it would not oppose the bill in the House of Representatives, noting it had been referred to a Senate committee for further inquiry.

Outcome

The bill was referred to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee for inquiry.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

McIntosh argued that the bill provided useful mechanisms for earlier notification of medicine discontinuations and simplified regulatory processes for similar biologic products. However, McIntosh contended that the legislation did not resolve the underlying structural issues causing frequent medicine shortages in Australia. McIntosh highlighted that Australia relies heavily on imported medicines, making the supply chain vulnerable to global disruptions and manufacturing delays. The speaker noted that despite existing reporting requirements, the number of approved substitute medicines had increased significantly, indicating systemic strain. McIntosh asserted that a warning system alone was insufficient without a broader strategy to enhance domestic manufacturing capability.