Question Time AU

General Debate

Negative Gearing

House of Representatives · Tuesday 30 June 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Rick Wilson criticised the government's proposed changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax, arguing they lacked a democratic mandate and mirrored defeated 2019 policies. He contended that these reforms would discourage private investment in rental housing, particularly among middle-income earners and essential workers in regional areas. Wilson warned that removing these tax concessions could lead to reduced housing supply, higher rents, and difficulties in staffing remote communities. He also highlighted the negative impact on young people's ability to save for retirement through share investments.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Wilson argued that the government's taxation reforms lacked a mandate because they were not tested at the 2019 election, where similar proposals were rejected by voters. Wilson stated that 70 per cent of negatively geared property owners hold only one investment property, describing them as middle-income earners such as nurses and police officers rather than wealthy investors. Wilson claimed that negative gearing encourages private investment in rental housing, which helps alleviate pressure on public housing systems. Wilson warned that removing these concessions would deter essential workers from relocating to regional areas like Laverton and Kalgoorlie, where housing incentives are crucial. Additionally, he argued that changes to capital gains tax would disadvantage young savers by removing the 50 per cent discount on share investments.