Question Time AU

General Debate

Gun Control

House of Representatives · Tuesday 30 June 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Andrew Gee criticised the government's response to the December 2025 terrorist attacks, arguing that rushed gun law reforms unfairly penalised law-abiding owners while failing to address intelligence failures. He highlighted severe economic impacts on regional firearm retailers, citing significant drops in sales and employment. Gee argued that the laws targeted legal owners rather than criminals and called for a full royal commission to investigate how extremists accessed firearms.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Gee argued that the government failed to call a transparent royal commission into the causes of the December 2025 attacks, instead rushing through gun law reforms. Gee contended that these laws unfairly targeted law-abiding firearm owners in regional Australia while ignoring intelligence gaps that allowed extremists with known links to access licensed firearms. Gee stated that the reforms did not address the core issue of illegal firearms, as criminals do not comply with licensing regimes or participate in buyback schemes. Gee emphasised that the current approach penalised those already following the law rather than preventing future harm.