Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Sex Discrimination Amendment (Sex-based Rights) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 29 June 2026

Continued from Monday 25 May 2026.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the Sex Discrimination Amendment (Sex-based Rights) Bill 2026, which sought to restore biological definitions of sex to federal law. Both speakers supported the legislation, arguing that previous amendments had eroded protections for women in spaces such as shelters and sports. They cited recent court rulings and statistics on violence against women to justify the need for clear legal distinctions. The speakers emphasised that the bill would protect women-only spaces without diminishing the dignity of transgender Australians.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Willcox supported the bill, arguing that the 2013 removal of biological definitions from federal statutes had rendered the legal category of woman meaningless. Willcox cited the Federal Court decision in Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd v Roxanne Tickle as evidence that current laws failed to protect women's privacy and safety in spaces like domestic violence shelters. Willcox stated the bill would reinstate binary biological definitions and replace the term different sex with opposite sex. Willcox clarified that the legislation was not an attack on transgender Australians but a measure to restore legal reality and protect women-only spaces from frivolous lawsuits.