Question Time AU

General Debate

Plastic Waste

House of Representatives · Monday 29 June 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion calling for the immediate implementation of a mandatory national Extended Producer Responsibility scheme for plastics under the Recycling and Waste Reduction Act 2020. Independent members Sophie Scamps and Kate Chaney argued that voluntary measures had failed and that urgent legislative action was required to address environmental harm and health risks. Labor members Emma Comer and Jerome Laxale acknowledged the severity of the plastic crisis but emphasised the government's current investments in recycling infrastructure and the need for careful sequencing to avoid market instability. National Party member Alison Penfold supported the motion, highlighting the economic benefits for regional manufacturing and the need for policy certainty to support existing facilities.

Outcome

The motion was not put to a vote as time expired during the debate.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Scamps moved the motion, arguing that Australia’s voluntary approach to plastic waste had comprehensively failed, with the country missing all national targets set in 2018. Scamps highlighted the environmental, climate, and health impacts of plastic pollution, noting that microplastics are found in human bodies and that plastic production fuels climate change. Scamps stated that a mandatory Extended Producer Responsibility scheme would create financial incentives for producers to reduce packaging and improve recyclability, while shifting costs away from households. Scamps noted that industry modelling suggested the scheme would add only 25 cents a week to the average grocery bill, and cited broad support from industry, environmental groups, and the public for such reforms.