Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Consideration in Detail

Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail

House of Representatives · Thursday 4 June 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Allegra Spender moved an amendment to the bill during consideration in detail. She argued that while the bill raised revenue through concession reductions, it failed to adequately lower marginal tax rates for workers. Her proposal sought to use the raised funds to reduce specific tax brackets in future years. The amendment was defeated in division 19, while the bill itself passed in division 20.

Outcome

The amendment moved by Spender was defeated in division 19, while the bill was passed in division 20.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Spender argued that tax reform should be budget neutral and prioritise lowering income taxes for younger Australians. Spender supported the bill's approach to reducing capital gains tax and negative gearing concessions but criticised the failure to cut marginal rates. Spender contended that bracket creep had eroded previous tax cuts and that the working tax offset was insufficient. Spender moved an amendment to reduce the 45 per cent, 37 per cent and 30 per cent tax rates in subsequent years using the revenue raised. Spender believed this would build community trust and support for the broader reform package.

Votes during this debate

Division 19: Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail Not passed 9–73 Division 20: Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail Passed 94–48