Question Time AU

General Debate

Budget

House of Representatives · Tuesday 26 May 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Angie Bell criticised the federal budget for discouraging economic aspiration and investment through tax changes. She argued that capital gains tax adjustments and reduced instant asset write-offs would harm small business owners and entrepreneurs. Bell highlighted the financial pressure on families regarding sports participation and the potential decline in philanthropy supporting the arts sector. She contrasted the government's spending approach with coalition policies aimed at supporting business growth.

Outcome

The debate concluded with no further speakers recorded in the provided transcript.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Bell argued that the budget represented a government hostility toward aspiration, innovation, and risk-taking. Bell claimed that changes to capital gains tax and the reduction of the instant asset write-off from $50,000 to $20,000 would penalise small business owners and tradies. Bell stated that these measures would destroy confidence in the small business community, which she described as the engine of the economy. Bell asserted that the government was redistributing wealth rather than growing the economy, while national debt approached $1 trillion. Bell also noted that financial pressures were forcing families to withdraw children from sports and that higher taxes would reduce philanthropy in the arts sector.