Opened the debate
Watson-Brown argued that the government prioritised corporate interests over public opinion by rejecting a 25 per cent gas export tax and a full ban on gambling advertising. Watson-Brown cited millions in donations from fossil fuel and gambling industries to major parties as evidence of undue corporate influence. Watson-Brown claimed that government reforms were tokenistic, noting that modelling suggested advertising restrictions would only reduce gambling harm by 0.8 per cent. Watson-Brown urged collective public pressure to overcome industry lobbying and achieve meaningful democratic accountability.