Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Consideration in Detail

Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail

House of Representatives · Monday 25 May 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on opposition amendments seeking to remove retrospective provisions and insert a sunset clause into the bill. Kevin Hogan argued that the retrospective start date lacked justification and that a sunset clause would allow for proper inquiry. Andrew Leigh opposed the amendments, citing the need for broad powers to address a historic shock to global oil supply and ensure fuel price stability. The amendments were defeated in a division, with the bill proceeding without the proposed changes.

Outcome

The amendments were not passed, with 45 votes in favour and 97 against.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Kevin Hogan (Page) (National Party) Nationals

Hogan moved six amendments to remove the bill's retrospective application, which was set to begin on 1 April 2026. Hogan argued that the government had provided no explanation for this specific start date or evidence of prior law breaches. The amendments also proposed a sunset clause repealing the changes on 2 July 2026 to allow time for inquiry. Hogan stated the opposition was willing to support the bill if it were non-retrospective and included this temporary measure.

Votes during this debate

Division 3: Competition and Consumer Amendment (Responding to Exceptional Circumstances) Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail Not passed 45–97