Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Competition and Consumer Amendment (Unfair Trading Practices) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 April 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The member for Fenner moved the second reading of the bill, which aims to modernise the Australian Consumer Law by prohibiting unfair trading practices, banning drip pricing, and regulating subscription traps. The legislation addresses gaps where current laws do not cover manipulative design features or hidden fees that cause consumer detriment. The member highlighted evidence of widespread consumer frustration with online purchases and difficult cancellation processes. The debate was adjourned without further speeches recorded in the transcript.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Leigh argued that the bill addresses significant gaps in consumer protection by targeting practices that manipulate choices or obscure true costs. Leigh stated that the legislation introduces a general prohibition on unfair trading practices, requiring businesses to avoid conduct that unreasonably distorts decision-making environments. Leigh explained that the bill mandates upfront disclosure of mandatory transaction fees to prevent drip pricing, ensuring fair competition between transparent and opaque businesses. Leigh also noted that the measure establishes clear rules for subscription transparency, including reminder notices and straightforward cancellation pathways. Leigh emphasised that these reforms are part of a broader government agenda to strengthen competition and protect consumers from hidden costs and manipulative design.