Question Time AU

General Debate

Fuel

House of Representatives · Tuesday 31 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Tom French raised a grievance regarding fuel security, arguing that the current government was actively managing supply disruptions through direct intervention and coordination. He contrasted these actions with the previous Liberal government's record, citing the closure of refineries and inadequate domestic stockholding measures as failures that left Australia vulnerable. French outlined specific steps taken by the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, including releasing fuel from stockholdings and adjusting standards to boost supply. He emphasised the importance of early action and real-time data monitoring to prevent shortages from impacting regional areas and the broader economy.

Outcome

The grievance was noted as part of the general debate.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

French argued that the government was effectively managing a global fuel supply shock by intervening directly to ensure fuel reached regional and independent service stations. French stated that the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, Chris Bowen, had released fuel from stockholdings, adjusted fuel standards, and coordinated nationally to prevent shortages. French criticised the previous Liberal government for overseeing the closure of four out of six refineries and for storing fuel in the United States rather than in Australia. French asserted that these past decisions had increased Australia's dependence on imports and vulnerability to global instability. French highlighted that the current approach focused on real-time information, cross-jurisdictional coordination, and early action to protect supply chains.