Question Time AU

General Debate

Cost of Living, Fuel, Energy

House of Representatives · Tuesday 31 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Dai Le criticised the government for delaying action on fuel excise cuts until a crisis emerged, arguing that the current response was insufficient. Le highlighted the disparity between Australia's energy exports and its reliance on imported refined fuel, noting a significant drop in strategic fuel reserves. The member opposed the solar sharer scheme, claiming it disadvantaged renters and shift workers, and called for expanded community solar programs and stricter fuel reserve obligations.

Outcome

The debate concluded with Dai Le calling for a binding roadmap to meet IEA fuel reserve obligations, an earlier domestic gas reservation policy, and a replacement for the solar sharer with a scaled-up community solar program.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Le argued that the government had neglected energy affordability for years, only acting after petrol prices exceeded $2.50 per litre and diesel surpassed $3.20. The member stated that public transport limitations in Fowler made car ownership a necessity, not a luxury, and that cost increases for contractors and goods were unabsorbable for many households. Le contended that the solar sharer scheme was flawed because it provided free electricity during midday hours when many workers were not home, potentially leading to higher costs during evening peak times. The member also noted that the scheme required smart meters and active opt-in, which would disadvantage renters and culturally diverse communities.