Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Customs Legislation Amendment (False Trade Marks Infringement Notices) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Wednesday 25 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the introduction of strict liability offences for importing goods with false trademarks to strengthen border controls against counterfeit items. The Assistant Minister argued that the measure would enhance consumer safety and protect intellectual property rights by allowing infringement notices as an alternative to prosecution. The bill aims to deter criminal enterprises linked to the black market trade of fake goods. The debate concluded with the motion being adjourned.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Hill moved that the bill be read a second time, arguing it would protect Australians from dangerous fake goods and safeguard genuine businesses from fraud. Hill stated that over 700,000 counterfeit items worth more than $35 million were seized in the 2024-25 financial year, highlighting the scale of the issue. The bill establishes a strict liability offence for bringing in products bearing fake trademarks, aligning with existing copyright laws. Hill emphasised that this reform targets commercial quantities of high-risk products, such as pharmaceuticals and vehicle parts, to reduce consumer safety risks. The measure allows Australian Border Force officers to issue infringement notices, providing a deterrent that impacts counterfeiters' profits without burdening small businesses with costly civil litigation.