Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Protecting Australia's Prime Agricultural Land Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 23 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the introduction of legislation to safeguard Australia's prime agricultural land from non-agricultural development. Independent member Andrew Gee moved the bill, arguing that current planning failures and urban sprawl threaten national food security. Katter's Australian Party member Bob Katter seconded the motion, highlighting the disparity between population density and land use. Both speakers emphasised the need to preserve agricultural capacity for domestic consumption.

Outcome

The bill was seconded by Bob Katter, but the transcript does not record the final vote or passage of the legislation.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Gee argued that the bill was essential for securing national food security and protecting prime agricultural land from urban sprawl and foreign renewable energy projects. Gee noted that agricultural production value had risen significantly, reaching $82.4 billion in 2023-24, with exports valued at $77.2 billion in 2024-25. Gee contended that the legislation would prohibit the use of prime agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes and prevent the expansion of existing non-agricultural uses. Gee criticised state and federal governments, particularly the National Party, for failing to enact protective planning laws or regulate renewable energy zones effectively.