Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Parliamentary Frameworks Legislation Amendment (Reviews) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Wednesday 4 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the Parliamentary Frameworks Legislation Amendment (Reviews) Bill 2026, which sought to consolidate statutory reviews of key parliamentary workplace legislation. The bill aimed to combine reviews of the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service Act 2023, the Members of Parliament (Staff) Act 1984, and the Parliamentary Business Resources Act 2017 into a single holistic assessment. It also proposed aligning the frequency of future reviews to occur every five years rather than each parliamentary term. The measure was introduced to reduce review fatigue and ensure legislative frameworks remained fit for purpose following significant reforms. The debate concluded with the bill being commended to the House.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned and the bill was commended to the House.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Gorman argued that the bill would allow the statutory reviews of the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service Act 2023, the Members of Parliament (Staff) Act 1984, and the Parliamentary Business Resources Act 2017 to be combined into a holistic review. Gorman stated that this consolidation would enable an integrated examination of the systems governing Commonwealth parliamentary workplaces, thereby reducing the risk of contradictory outcomes. Gorman noted that existing legislated timeframes prevented contemporaneous reviews, which the bill would rectify by allowing the combined review to commence from 23 March 2026. Gorman further argued that aligning the frequency of future reviews to every five years would provide sufficient time for recommendations to be implemented and for changes to mature. Gorman concluded that this approach would reduce review fatigue for parliamentarians and their staff while ensuring the frameworks accorded with community expectations.