Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Royal Commissions Legislation Amendment (Protections for Providing Information) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 2 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Attorney-General moved the second reading of the bill, which establishes a framework for royal commissions to handle sensitive intelligence and operational information. The legislation aims to remove legal barriers that deter witnesses from providing evidence to the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion and future commissions. It introduces immunities from secrecy offences and a defence in the Criminal Code for those who disclose information in accordance with approved arrangements. The debate was adjourned following the Attorney-General's speech.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Rowland argued that royal commissions require strong powers to investigate national security matters effectively. Rowland stated that current secrecy laws create uncertainty that deters potential witnesses from sharing essential information. The bill creates a safe pathway for disclosing sensitive data by providing immunity from prosecution when information is shared via approved arrangements. Rowland emphasized that these protections ensure witnesses can assist commissions without fear of criminal liability for breaching secrecy provisions.

Government response

Rowland explained that the bill amends the Royal Commissions Act to prevent secrecy provisions from being used as an excuse to refuse evidence. Rowland noted that the legislation introduces a new defence in the Criminal Code for communicating information to royal commissions, aligning them with courts and tribunals. The Attorney-General highlighted that the framework balances national security needs with the necessity for candid testimony. Rowland commended the bill for establishing clear, enduring protections for witnesses providing information in good faith.