Question Time AU

General Debate

Housing

House of Representatives · Monday 2 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by the Australian Labor Party commending the government's housing agenda, particularly the expansion of the five per cent deposit scheme. Labor members argued that the scheme and broader $45 billion plan were delivering tangible results, with over 220,000 Australians accessing homeownership. Opposition members and the Greens criticised the policy for inflating prices and increasing debt without addressing supply constraints, while an independent member called for broader tax reform and supply-side measures. The motion was debated but the transcript does not record a final vote outcome.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Abdo moved the motion to commend the government's $45 billion housing agenda, highlighting the expansion of the five per cent deposit scheme to all first home buyers three months ahead of schedule. Abdo argued that the scheme had enabled more than 220,000 Australians to purchase their first home, with 3,912 people in his electorate of Calwell benefiting. Abdo contended that the housing challenge was decades in the making due to previous underinvestment and that the current government was addressing it through building more homes, easing purchase barriers, and improving rental conditions. Abdo criticised the Coalition for opposing every major housing measure, including Help to Buy and build-to-rent initiatives, while the government focused on delivery and skills training for tradies.

Opposition response

Caldwell argued that the government was failing to address the housing crisis, noting that rents had risen by 22 per cent and mortgages were becoming unaffordable due to inflation and interest rates. Caldwell disputed the claim that the crisis was 40 years in the making, asserting it had worsened significantly under the current government. Caldwell claimed the target of 1.2 million new homes was unachievable, citing a shortfall of 80,000 homes in the first year. Caldwell attributed rising construction costs to the influence of the CFMEU and warned that higher taxes proposed by the Treasurer would further reduce housing supply.