Question Time AU

General Debate

Migration

House of Representatives · Monday 9 February 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by Zali Steggall to acknowledge migration as a fundamental contributor to Australia's economy and social fabric, while urging members to reject divisive rhetoric. Monique Ryan seconded the motion, highlighting the vulnerability of migrant communities to negative political narratives and noting the significant backlog of individuals on bridging visas. Julie-Ann Campbell supported the motion, emphasising the government's migration strategy and the positive impact of multiculturalism on local communities and the economy. All speakers agreed that migration is essential for addressing labour shortages and sustaining economic growth, while criticising political actors who blame migrants for structural policy failures.

Outcome

The motion was agreed to without division.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Steggall argued that migration is a defining structural feature of Australia's economy, with approximately 30 per cent of the population born overseas. Steggall stated that each extra 1,000 migrants adds about $124 million yearly to the economy via workforce supply, taxes, and business creation. Steggall contended that complex challenges such as housing affordability and infrastructure pressure stem from long-term planning decisions rather than migration levels. Steggall criticised right-wing parties and the opposition for using populist rhetoric that blames migrants for government policy failures, arguing this undermines social cohesion. Steggall called for respectful, evidence-based debate on program size and skills mix without undermining the dignity of migrant communities.