Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Criminal Code Amendment (Flag Protection) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 9 February 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned a bill to criminalise the deliberate or reckless desecration or burning of the Australian national flag, the Aboriginal flag, and the Torres Strait Islander flag. The member for Mayo moved the second reading, arguing that such acts show contempt for national identity and that public opinion strongly supports protection. The member for Fowler seconded the motion, emphasising the flag's significance to migrants and refugees as a symbol of safety and unity. Both speakers contended that the legislation would foster social cohesion rather than suppress political expression. No amendments were moved during this stage of the debate.

Outcome

The transcript does not state the final result of the vote on the second reading.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Sharkie moved the second reading of the bill, which proposes making it a criminal offence to deliberately or recklessly desecrate or burn the three national flags. Sharkie noted that penalties would include up to two years imprisonment for a first offence and a minimum of one year for subsequent offences. Sharkie argued that many other nations, including France, Germany, and New Zealand, already prohibit such acts. Sharkie stated that the bill excludes accidental damage, respectful private destruction of dilapidated flags, or depictions in media. Sharkie claimed that recent surveys indicated seventy per cent of Australians support making flag burning an offence. Sharkie asserted that the legislation would draw a line against hatred and promote respect for the history and communities represented by the flags.