Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

National Health Amendment (Passive Immunological Products) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Thursday 5 February 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned a bill to expand the definition of vaccine in the National Health Act 1953. This change aims to allow new therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, to be listed on the National Immunisation Program. The government argued this would improve access to treatments like Beyfortus for respiratory syncytial virus. The debate was adjourned without further speeches.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

White moved that the bill be read a second time, stating it would expand the vaccine definition to include emerging therapies. White argued this change was necessary to list products like Beyfortus, which protects infants from respiratory syncytial virus. White noted that the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee had deferred recommending Beyfortus due to current legislative definitions. White claimed the bill would prevent fragmented access to healthcare and align with the National Immunisation Strategy for Australia 2025-2030.