Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Tuesday 3 February 2026

Continued from Wednesday 26 November 2025.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Simon Kennedy supported the bill as a necessary step to provide legal clarity for the digital assets sector, which had previously operated in a regulatory grey area. He argued that while the legislation was welcome, it was significantly delayed and insufficient to prevent Australia from losing investment and jobs to other jurisdictions. Kennedy called for further reforms, including stablecoin frameworks and licensing flexibility, to ensure Australia could compete globally in fintech and blockchain technologies.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Kennedy argued that the bill provided overdue legal clarity for digital assets, defining tokens and integrating platforms into the regulated financial system to boost investor confidence. Kennedy contended that previous regulatory uncertainty had driven capital and jobs offshore, citing a significant drop in fintech investment. Kennedy stated that the bill was a sensible start but criticized the government for delaying reform, which allowed ASIC to enforce laws through litigation rather than clear legislation. Kennedy emphasized that Australia was falling behind comparable jurisdictions like the US, UK, and EU in regulating stablecoins and tokenisation.