Question Time AU

General Debate

National Security

House of Representatives · Tuesday 25 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Melissa Price argued that Australia faces its most dangerous strategic environment since the Second World War, citing warnings from intelligence agencies about threats to critical infrastructure. She criticised the government for reducing sustainment budgets for existing equipment while failing to invest sufficiently in new capabilities such as missile defence and satellite connectivity. Price highlighted delays at the Henderson shipyard and the cancellation of the JP 9102 satellite project as evidence of poor planning. She also raised grievances regarding the closure of a defence childcare centre and the withdrawal of a bill affecting veterans' appeal rights, accusing the government of neglecting defence families and veterans.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Price argued that the government is responding to heightened security risks with outdated budgeting, forcing the Australian Defence Force to cut sustainment budgets for platforms like the F-35 fighter jets. Price contended that this neglects the need for higher defence expenditure, reaching a minimum of three per cent of GDP, to fund mass missile production, integrated air and missile defence, and unmanned systems. Price criticised the cancellation of the JP 9102 satellite project and slow progress at the Henderson shipyard, warning that Western Australia could lose multibillion dollar contracts. Price also highlighted the closure of the Flying Start childcare centre at RAAF Base Pearce, noting the lack of government response to her inquiries. Furthermore, she opposed the withdrawn Defence Amendment (Defence Honours and Awards Appeal Tribunal) Bill 2025, arguing it would have removed appeal rights for veterans.