Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Interactive Gambling Amendment (Ending Online Wagering on Greyhound Racing) Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 24 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on amending the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 to remove the exemption for online wagering on greyhound racing. Members argued that the industry is characterised by systemic animal cruelty, high injury and death rates, and declining public support. Both speakers supported the bill as a necessary step to reduce revenue streams for the industry and align federal law with community values regarding animal welfare. The motion was moved and seconded without opposition in this segment.

Outcome

The motion for the second reading was moved by Andrew Wilkie and seconded by Sophie Scamps.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Wilkie moved the second reading motion, arguing that the greyhound racing industry causes widespread animal suffering through injury, death, and poor welfare standards. Wilkie cited data showing a decline in attendance and growing public concern, with polls indicating majority support for ending dog racing. Wilkie highlighted that online wagering sustains the industry, noting billions of dollars in bets and high injury rates in states like New South Wales and Victoria. Wilkie supported the bill as a straightforward measure to remove the wagering exemption, providing a two-year transition period for the industry to adjust. Wilkie maintained that while a total ban is the ultimate goal, ending online gambling is a critical federal intervention to hasten the industry's demise.