Question Time AU

General Debate

Brisbane Olympic and Paralympic Games

House of Representatives · Monday 24 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by the Greens calling for independent oversight, affordable housing, and community engagement regarding the Brisbane 2032 Olympics. The Labor member highlighted significant federal infrastructure investments and strict funding conditions to ensure value for taxpayers. The Independent member supported the motion, citing international examples of both successful and failed Olympic legacies and urging better long-term planning. The discussion focused on balancing economic benefits with community needs and environmental sustainability.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Elizabeth Watson-Brown (Ryan) (Australian Greens) Greens

Watson-Brown argued that the Queensland government had failed to meaningfully engage with Brisbane residents or urban planning experts regarding the Games. Watson-Brown contended that current plans prioritised developer profits over public benefit, leading to rising rents and the privatisation of inner-city land. Watson-Brown called for an independent oversight committee and a master plan to ensure the Games delivered affordable housing, improved public transport, and public parkland. Watson-Brown referenced the successful community campaign for South Bank as a model for resisting private development and advocated for an 'Olympics for the People' summit.

Government response

Emma Comer (Petrie) (Australian Labor Party) ALP

Comer stated that the federal government was delivering the largest contribution to sporting infrastructure in Australian history, with a capped commitment of $3.4 billion for venue upgrades. Comer detailed investments in 17 new or upgraded venues across Queensland, including the National Aquatic Centre and a new stadium, alongside $12.4 billion in transport projects. Comer emphasised that funding was conditional on robust project validation and comprehensive stakeholder engagement, particularly regarding the Victoria Park precinct. Comer argued that this approach ensured transparency, community respect, and long-term benefits for Queenslanders.