Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025, National Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2025, Environment Information Australia Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Customs Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Excise Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Restoration Charge Imposition) Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Thursday 6 November 2025

Continued from Wednesday 5 November 2025.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the second reading of a package of bills including the Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025, the National Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2025, and various charge imposition bills. The sole speaker, Melissa Price, opposed the legislation, arguing it would increase bureaucracy, stifle investment, and harm the economy. She criticised the proposed environmental agency structure and specific provisions such as net gain requirements and emissions reporting. The debate concluded with the bills failing to pass on the first division but passing on the second.

Outcome

The bills were not passed on the first division with 7 votes in favour and 65 against, but passed on the second division with 90 votes in favour and 44 against.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Price opposed the bill package, arguing it prioritised ideology over practicality and threatened Australian jobs and investment. Price claimed the reforms would centralise control in Canberra, expand bureaucracy, and create a slower, more complex approval system than the existing framework. Price highlighted concerns about vague definitions for unacceptable impacts and net gain requirements, which she said would lead to litigation and uncertainty for industry. Price also criticised the proposed National Environmental Protection Agency for lacking accountability, noting the CEO would be a statutory officer immune from ministerial dismissal.

Votes during this debate

Division 12: Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025, National Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2025, Environment Information Australia Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Customs Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Excise Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Restoration Charge Imposition) Bill 2025; Second Reading Not passed 7–65 Division 13: Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025, National Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2025, Environment Information Australia Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Customs Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Excise Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Restoration Charge Imposition) Bill 2025; Second Reading Passed 90–44