Question Time AU

General Debate

Medicare

House of Representatives · Monday 3 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on the government's expansion of Medicare bulk-billing incentives to all Australians, effective 1 November 2025. Labor members highlighted the policy as a major cost-of-living relief measure that would increase fully bulk-billed practices and visits, citing specific clinic conversions in their electorates. Opposition and National Party members argued that the policy failed to address critical shortages of GPs in regional areas, increased operational costs for clinics, and diverted resources from complex care. They also raised concerns about new out-of-pocket costs for pathology tests and the lack of urgent care clinics in some regional communities.

Outcome

The motion was debated as private members' business; no final vote result was stated in the provided transcript.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Gregg moved the motion acknowledging the expansion of bulk-billing incentives to all Australians and the new payment for practices bulk-billing every patient. Gregg argued this represented the largest investment in Medicare since its inception, aiming for nine out of ten GP visits to be bulk-billed by 2030. Gregg cited examples from his electorate where clinics had converted to full bulk-billing, saving patients significant money. Gregg contrasted these measures with the previous government's record, stating it had never increased Medicare rebates and had cut hospital funding.

Opposition response

Willcox argued that despite government claims, bulk-billing was unavailable in his regional electorate of Dawson, forcing residents to use credit cards or travel long distances. Willcox claimed out-of-pocket costs had risen by 25 per cent in his area since Labor took office. Willcox criticised the government for funding clinics in Canberra while neglecting regional communities, arguing that promises of improvement by 2030 did not help those needing care immediately. Willcox asserted that the policy widened the divide between city and country healthcare access.