Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Thursday 30 October 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Leader of the House moved the second reading of the Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025, arguing that current environmental laws are broken and failing both nature and the economy. The speech outlined a reform package based on the Samuel review, focusing on stronger protection, efficient approvals, and greater accountability through a new National Environmental Protection Agency. The proposal includes new national standards, net gain offsets, streamlined assessment pathways, and enhanced penalties for breaches. The debate was adjourned following this single speech.

Outcome

Debate adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Burke argued that the existing Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 is ineffective for protecting the environment or facilitating necessary economic projects like housing and renewable energy. Burke stated the bill implements reforms faithful to the Samuel review, organised into three pillars: stronger protection, efficient decision-making, and accountability. Key measures include establishing national environmental standards with a no-regression clause, defining unacceptable impacts, and introducing net gain requirements for offsets. The reforms also aim to streamline approvals through accredited state processes, bioregional planning, and faster assessment pathways to reduce delays and costs. Burke emphasised the creation of an independent National Environmental Protection Agency to oversee compliance and enforcement, alongside improved data transparency and First Nations engagement.