Question Time AU

General Debate

Uluru-Kata Tjuta Handback: 40th Anniversary

House of Representatives · Tuesday 28 October 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Marion Scrymgour reflected on the Uluru handback anniversary, emphasising the importance of truth-telling and reconciliation, and criticised the Northern Territory government's approach to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Art Gallery of Australia site. Ben Small opposed government interventions in consumer choice, specifically targeting vehicle emissions standards and subsidies, while raising concerns about solar panel supply chains and excessive business regulation. The debate concluded with a division called in the House.

Outcome

A division was called in the House of Representatives.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Scrymgour highlighted the significance of the Uluru handback as a step toward recognising Anangu custodianship and argued that truth-telling remains essential for reconciliation. Scrymgour criticised the Northern Territory government for dismissing concerns regarding the proposed site for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Art Gallery of Australia, noting its proximity to commercial alcohol and gaming venues. Scrymgour asserted that respecting cultural authority and engaging with local communities would benefit both Indigenous peoples and the Alice Springs economy.