Question Time AU

General Debate

Timber industry

House of Representatives · Monday 27 October 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by the National Party to acknowledge the sustainability of native hardwood harvesting and urge federal support for the industry. Opposition members argued that state bans on harvesting have harmed regional economies, increased fire risks, and led to imports from countries with lower environmental standards. Government members defended their record, highlighting significant federal investments in innovation, workforce training, and plantation establishment, while emphasising that day-to-day forest management remains a state responsibility. The discussion contrasted the opposition's focus on the negative impacts of state-level restrictions with the government's emphasis on national framework stability and financial support for industry modernisation.

Outcome

The motion was debated but the transcript does not state the final vote result.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Chester moved a motion acknowledging that Australia possesses the scientific knowledge and regulatory framework to sustainably manage native forests for timber harvesting. Chester argued that banning native timber harvesting forces reliance on imports from nations with poorer environmental protocols and undermines carbon sequestration benefits provided by timber products. Chester contended that state governments in Victoria and New South Wales had decimated the industry based on political ideology rather than environmental science, resulting in job losses and reduced community safety during bushfires. Chester cited peer-reviewed research from former CSIRO scientists to refute claims that harvesting increases wildfire intensity or harms biodiversity, urging the federal government to resist further bans and support a public information campaign.