Question Time AU

General Debate

Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program

House of Representatives · Monday 27 October 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on the condition of regional roads and the adequacy of federal funding for their maintenance. Opposition members argued that the government had neglected regional infrastructure, citing rising road fatalities, significant funding shortfalls for councils, and the expiration of the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program. Government members countered that they were delivering record investment through expanded Roads to Recovery and Black Spot Program funding, while attributing road deterioration to climate change and previous government policies. The motion called on the government to outline its funding strategy for local roads.

Outcome

The motion was debated as part of private members' business.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Webster moved the motion, highlighting surveys that identified potholes and poor road conditions as top safety concerns for Victorians. Webster noted that local roads comprise 77 per cent of the national network but face chronic underfunding, with replacement costs far exceeding maintenance expenditure. Webster argued that the government had axed the Local Roads and Community Infrastructure Program without providing an alternative, contributing to rising road fatality rates in remote areas. Webster criticised the government's proposal to lower speed limits as a substitute for proper infrastructure investment.