Bill Debate · Second Reading
House of Representatives · Monday 27 October 2025
Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia
The debate focused on introducing mandatory minimum sentences for child sexual abuse offences involving carriage or postal services. The opposition argued that current sentencing frameworks were inadequate, citing a significant rise in online exploitation reports and specific cases where offenders received minimal penalties. The bill aims to close loopholes regarding recognisance release orders and ensure sentences reflect the gravity of the crimes. The debate concluded with the motion being adjourned.
The debate was adjourned.
Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.
Opened the debate
Leeser moved the motion for the second reading of the bill, describing the prevention of child sexual abuse as an urgent and non-partisan matter. Leeser stated that the issue required immediate parliamentary attention and ceded the remainder of the speaking time to the shadow Attorney-General to elaborate on the proposal.
Opposition response
Wallace seconded the motion, arguing that the bill ensures perpetrators face justice by establishing mandatory minimum sentences for offences involving carriage or postal services. Wallace highlighted a 41 per cent increase in online child sexual exploitation reports in the 2024-25 financial year and cited the Maloney case as evidence of inadequate current sentencing. Wallace stated the bill closes loopholes allowing recognisance release orders without exceptional circumstances and builds on previous bipartisan mandatory sentencing reforms. Wallace urged the government to support the legislation to protect children and deter abuse.