Question Time AU

General Debate

Banana Industry

House of Representatives · Monday 27 October 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by Bob Katter calling for the rejection of a Philippine application to export bananas to Australia due to biosecurity, economic, and labour concerns. Katter and Andrew Gee argued that imports posed severe risks of disease introduction and undermined local growers, citing past biosecurity failures. Matt Smith responded that the government was conducting a standard scientific assessment required by World Trade Organization rules, denying any imminent threat to domestic production. The discussion highlighted tensions between protecting local agriculture and maintaining international trade obligations.

Outcome

The motion was debated but no final vote result was recorded in the provided transcript.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Katter moved a motion urging the government to reject the Philippine banana import application immediately. Katter argued that the Australian banana industry, worth $1.3 billion and employing over 15,000 people, faced existential threats from diseases such as Moko, Black Sigatoka, and Banana Freckle present in the Philippines. Katter cited reports from the US Department of Labor and other bodies regarding poor working conditions and child labour in Philippine plantations, contrasting weekly wages of $50 in the Philippines with $1,153.30 in Australia. Katter contended that the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry was failing to consider environmental and social factors, focusing only on disease risk, and called for new legislation addressing slavery and unfair trade practices.